TOPPER IAS
Login
Polity

Renewed scrutiny of in-house procedure for judicial misconduct

14 September 2026 · ⏱ 2 min read · GS-2 GS Paper 2 - Polity / Judiciary

Why in News?

Allegations against a High Court judge have drawn attention to the constitutional removal process and the judiciary's in-house inquiry procedure.

What is happening

Allegations against a sitting High Court judge have renewed attention on how the judiciary handles complaints of misconduct against its own members.

A sitting High Court or Supreme Court judge can be removed from office only through a motion passed by a special majority in both Houses of Parliament under Article 124(4), read with Article 218 of the Constitution.

Short of removal, the Supreme Court's "in-house procedure" allows a committee of judges to inquire into complaints and recommend steps such as asking the judge concerned to resign.

Key facts

TopicRenewed scrutiny of in-house procedure for judicial misconduct
SyllabusGS Paper 2 - Polity / Judiciary
PlacesIndia
Keywordsjudicial accountability, Article 124, in-house procedure, High Court judge

UPSC / KPSC relevance

Prelims

Remember: judicial accountability; Article 124; in-house procedure; High Court judge. Expect a statement-based or match-the-following question on this.

Mains

Use as an example in GS-2 answers (GS Paper 2 - Polity / Judiciary). Frame: issue → provision/policy → implication → way forward.

🧠 YOU HAVE READ IT.
NOW PROVE YOU REMEMBER IT.

Test yourself on Renewed scrutiny of in-house procedure for judicial misconduct.

  • 5 UPSC-level questions
  • Instant explanations
  • Identify your weak areas
  • Personalised revision
Take the 5-minute test →

Powered by AdaptIQ

Can you answer this?

With reference to judicial accountability in India, consider the following statements: 1. A sitting High Court judge can be removed from office only through a motion passed by a special majority in both Houses of Parliament. 2. The Supreme Court's in-house procedure allows a committee of judges to recommend that a judge resign, but such a recommendation cannot by itself remove the judge from office. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer

Answer: C — Removal of a High Court judge requires a special-majority motion in Parliament under Article 124(4)/Article 218; short of that, the in-house procedure can only recommend resignation, not remove a judge.

4 more questions on this topic are waiting in AdaptIQ. Take 5 MCQs →

Sources

Government and official releases; PIB; The Hindu; Indian Express. Curated and verified by Topper IAS editorial.

More today

  • Assam's pygmy hog population rebuilds through captive breedingEnvironment
  • UN chief backs demand for Security Council expansionInternational Relations
  • India and Vietnam review defence cooperationInternational Relations
  • India widens uranium sourcing to fuel nuclear expansionInternational Relations
  • India's first Vande Bharat freight train completes trial runScience & Tech
  • Renewed focus on ISRO's role in India's space policyScience & Tech
  • Counter-terrorism law and institutions back in focusPolity
  • Supreme Court examines a student's detention under the NSAPolity
  • Saudi pipeline outage threatens global oil supply
    TOPPER IAS

    UPSC & KPSC preparation. Since 2014, Vijayanagar, Bengaluru.

    3rd Floor, Mahendra Towers, near Vijayanagar Metro, Bengaluru 560040
    +91 63632 19044 · helpdesk@topperias.com

    © 2026 TOPPER IAS · Read on Topper IAS → Master on AdaptIQ